真相：裕仁天皇与侵华战争

• 发表：2024-06-01
• 分类：历史传记
• 围观：44

• 洛南

  2017-09-04
  这本书在日本史学界遭到强烈批判，日本学者著有论文集系统予以反驳，主要是因为作者史料不够想象力来凑，原书写得非常文学化，还有不少硬伤，译本的题目起得太有天朝特色了
• wishyll

  2017-03-04
  这部著作相当有名气，但是恶评也同样的多。事实上，与很多人想的很不一样的是，这部著作一个很大的批评点在于，它用的史料不仅不新，而且比较过时（至少按照日本历史学研究的标准是这样），而且作者是通过某种既定框架的叙述而不是通过史料的证明来链接历史的。当缺少历史证据的时候，作者就转为使用也许，大概，虽然昭和天皇没有这么说，但是。。。这样暧昧不明的句子来串联起一个接一个的事件。正如有些美国历史学家评论这部作品所表明的那样，作者想象了一个Hirohito而背离了严格的历史学家所应有的批判态度。把历史作品写成了小说。对于不了解这一领域研究的人而言，这部作品或许真的很厉害，并且批评者也的确承认，作者提起天皇责任这个角度是非常值得肯定的，但是不代表这部作品从日本史研究的角度而言不是一部不怎么好的著作
• 倾适小哈

  2016-06-09
  书名和简介真的是……很有意思……

• heidrich

  2017-09-19
  Tanaka was the first prime minister to discover that a strong-willed emperor capable of playing a determining role in politics could make like absolutely miserable for the leader of a political party. Almost from the moment Tanaka became prime minister, Hirohito and the court group took a keen interest in his performance and soon found themselves at odds with most of his policies. They disapproved of the way the Seiyukai Party had expanded its power through an aggressive policy of personnel appointments. With his Confucian and bushido education, Hirohito wanted officials appointed solely on the basis of ability, not political criteria or affiliation.
• heidrich

  2017-09-17
  …Thus, rather than blindly putting his seal to the revised national defense plan, he approved it "only after he had fully understood it." This insistence on withholding his assent until he had been made fully informed was his standard operating procedure after he became emperor in his own right.
• heidrich

  2017-09-17
  By the time Hirohito became emperor, he had grasped the utilitarian value of myths and clung to them as to other notions of statecraft. Whenever convenient he used such myths to rationalize his own behavior, to buttress the power of the imperial court vis-à-vis other elites in the ruling bloc, and to position himself outside political and secular responsibility. At the same time the more Hirohito lived the role of "sacred and direct" monarch, the more he came to rely on religious belief as a mechanism of power as well as a source of strength under trying conditions.

• 《真相：裕仁天皇与侵华战争》的学术价值如何？

  本书具有极高的学术价值，被视为研究二战日本史的里程碑之作。其严谨的方法论、详实的史料和深刻的分析，为后续研究奠定了坚实基础。它不仅挑战了传统叙事，还推动了学界对天皇制、军国主义及战争责任的重新审视，影响深远。

• 《真相：裕仁天皇与侵华战争》对日本社会有何影响？

  该书在日本社会引发巨大争议，部分右翼势力试图压制其传播，但同时也促使更多日本人直面历史。它推动了日本国内对战争责任的讨论，影响了教科书编写和历史教育，成为反思战争、追求和平的重要思想资源，具有深远的社会意义。

• 《真相：裕仁天皇与侵华战争》的史料来源有哪些？

  本书史料来源广泛，包括日本皇室档案、政府解密文件、战时记录以及比克斯本人的大量采访。作者还参考了盟军占领时期的调查资料，确保内容的权威性和客观性。这些一手资料为书中观点提供了坚实支撑，使论述极具说服力。

• 历史传记
  
  美国史新编
• 历史传记
  
  基督教教义史
• 历史传记
  
  哈尔滨建筑艺术
• 历史传记
  
  大失控与大混乱
• 历史传记
  
  中国地理大发现
• 历史传记
  
  文明史
• 历史传记
  
  里尔克传
• 历史传记
  
  中东国家通史（伊朗卷）