当代形而上学导论

- 书名:当代形而上学导论
- 作者: 麦克尔·路克斯
- 格式:PDF
- 时间:2024-06-27
- 评分:
- ISBN:9787309061499
《当代形而上学导论(第2版)》主要内容:形而上学是哲学领域内最为高深晦涩的分支,但《当代形而上学导论》却以较为通俗的语言深入浅出地讲解了各个重要的议题和论证,即使没有受过专门哲学训练的读者也可以理解。可读性和通俗性乃是《当代形而上学导论》的最大特点之一。《当代形而上学导论》另一个重要特点是它的历史性评述。它一直追溯到形而上学的源头,即古希腊哲学家亚里士多德所给予的定义和论述,以及中世纪哲学家所讨论的焦点,也就是,唯名论与唯实论之间的争论。然后,《当代形而上学导论》讲述了近代哲学家的不同解释和发展,其重点是介绍德国哲学家康德的理论。最后,《当代形而上学导论》阐明了当代西方哲学家的研究专题和方向。总之,《当代形而上学导论》为读者呈现出一条鲜明的形而上学发展史。其次,《当代形而上学导论》的显著特点是它的时代性。《当代形而上学导论》的标题,“当代形而上学导论”,十分明确地表明,它并不局限于古代的学说。《当代形而上学导论》聚焦于二十和二十_世纪的哲学家,随着时代的发展,这些哲学家不但提出了崭新的哲学问题,而且提供了独特的创见,把形而上学推向了一个前所未有的高度。《当代形而上学导论》会把读者带到哲学研究的最前沿。此外,《当代形而上学导论》全面而系统地论述形而上学这门哲学分支,几乎涉及这个领域内所有的重要课题,并且清晰地勾画出相互抗争的关键异议,以及有条理地分析各种代表性的论证和它们之间的关系,为读者建立了一个批判思维的范例。
麦尔可·路克斯(Michael J. Loux),美国圣母大学(University of Notre Dame)哲学教授。他持有美国芝加哥大学的哲学博士学位。由于在学术上的杰出贡献,他被授予George N. Shuster这个特殊的教授头衔。他的主要研究领域包括形 而上学与西方古代哲学,其研究成果被美国哲学界的同事所公认。从1970年起,他发表了十来本专著和大量的论文
-
群 レイ2018-05-31翻译有数字都犯错这种硬伤..时空论和分体论部分很有帮助
-
Dionysus2020-09-29现在看这样的书跟之前要求的不太一样,现在会认为缺乏重构论证这一步就介绍得不到位、不详细。
-
把未来揪起来2012-08-16真的好难呀,看起来很费力很费力。
-
/nuː s/2013-09-02Thus, he proposes that we understand the claim(1) Event x was a necessary condition for event yin terms of the counterfactual conditional(2) If x had not occurred, y would not have occurred;
-
/nuː s/2013-09-02Lewis mentions another problem for an account like Mackie’s. This is the problem of causal preemption. Here, we have two events, a and b, each of which, taken by itself, would cause a third event, c. However, when a and b both occur, a acts to block b’s normal causal role and goes on to cause c all by itself.a→c↘b ||So b occurs, but is preempted by a. However, since the circumstances are such that had a not blocked b, b would have caused c, b is an insufficient, but necessary component in a bundle of factors (including b and the relevant circumstances) that while sufficient for c is not necessary for c. So b is an INUS condition for c; but it is not the cause of c, so, again, a counterexample to Mackie’s analysis.
-
/nuː s/2013-08-29Frequently, the austere nominalist defends this strategy by challenging the explanatory power of the Platonic schema. If the Platonic schema is to provide a genuine explanation of attribute agreement, universals have to be things that can be identified and characterized independently of the facts they are introduced to explain; otherwise, any application of the schema represents the proverbial sort of pseudoexplanation in which the phenomenon of sleep is explained by a virtus dormitiva, a faculty that can be identified only as the one causally responsible for sleep.
-
小说文学
-
小说文学
-
小说文学
-
小说文学
-
小说文学
-
小说文学
-
小说文学
-
小说文学