面具与真相

最新书摘:
  • 大宝没在学习
    2024-04-23
    尤利西斯想说服阿喀琉斯(Achilles)重新加入战争,他动用了时间作为渐渐削弱自然等级秩序的破坏性力量这一隐喻,即在时间的进程里,你的古老英雄式行动将被遗忘,你的荣誉将被新英雄掩盖一因此假如你想延续你战士荣光的闪耀,你就要重新加入战争。
  • 大宝没在学习
    2024-03-12
    每一个悲伤的事物都有二十个影子,它们拥有悲伤的外表,但事实上不是悲伤;悲痛的眼睛中充满了盈盈泪水,将一个完整东西分为很多小对象;就像远景,从正面看仅仅是一片混乱,一旦斜目而视则显现为突出的外形:温柔的王后,歪着头看主人的离去,发现了悲伤的形状,比主人更甚,痛哭失声;而这东西—如实地观看—其实什么都不是,仅仅是它所不是的东西的影子。
  • 大宝没在学习
    2023-12-26
    我认为自由市场资本主义(free market capitalism)中的成功或失败的“非理性”的优点在于,它恰好容许我视我的失败(或成功)为出于偶然和“不值得”。资本主义的不公义恰好是使它能够被大多数人容忍的原因(假如我知道我的失败不是因为我的次等素质,而是出于偶然,我就能更轻易地接受它)。
  • 大宝没在学习
    2023-12-26
    “我十分清楚事情的确是我看见的那样,即站在我面前的是一个腐败、软弱的人,但无论如何,我恭敬地对待他,他佩戴着法官的纹章(isignia),因此当他张口说话,法律自身通过他在说话。”因此,我实际上相信他的话而不是我的眼睛。
  • 大宝没在学习
    2023-10-14
    2003年2月,当美国国务卿科林・威尔(Colin Powell)联会发表,以动其他国家袭击伊拉克时,美国代表团要求用另一个视觉饰物遮盖演讲台墙上的大型的毕加索《格尔尼卡》(Guernica)复制画。虽然美国官方解释称《格尔尼卡》不适合用作鲍威尔的电视(信号)传送的视觉背景,每一个人都很清楚美国代表团害怕的东西:《格尔尼卡》一一幅被视为描绘了空袭战中德国对西班牙城市造成的灾难性后果的画作,假如被用作鲍威尔鼓吹(以拥有超优势军力的美国空军)空袭伊拉克的电视演说的视觉背景,将引致所谓的“错误的联想”。当拉康说压抑和被压抑物的回归是同一个过程时,他的意思就是这个:假如美国代表团抑制自己遮盖《格尔尼卡》的要求,很可能没有人会将鲍威尔的演说同他背后的画作联系起来一正是这个变化、正是掩盖画作的动作,为画作引来了注意力并强加给它错误的联想,(因而最终)确认了画作的真理。
  • 大宝没在学习
    2023-10-14
    (相对于憎恨和冷漠)世上存在一种对称的伪善,由以下的内容构成:“我爱你而且会接受你将做出的任何选择,所以即使(你明知道)你的拒绝将毁掉我,请选择你真心想要的对象,而且不要考虑它对我的影响吧!”这个选项的操纵式虚假性当然存在于它“诚实地”坚持并利用我可以说不作为强迫我说好的额外压力:“当我如此全心全意地爱你,你怎么可以拒绝我?”
  • 大宝没在学习
    2023-10-14
    这种自愿悖论——自由地选择那些任何情况下都属于义务的选项、这种伪装悖论一虽然实际上不存在,但维系此处存在自由选项的表象(appearance)与空洞的符号姿态(empty symbolic gesture)这一概念是严格地互相依存的。这个姿态(一个选项/邀约)是一个意在被拒绝的姿态。
  • Lichtung
    2020-01-24
    A man who believes himself to be a grain of seed is taken to a mental institution where the doctors do their best to convince him that he is not a seed but a man. When he is cured (convinced that he is not a grain of seed but a man) and is allowed to leave the hospital, he immediately comes back trembling. There is a chicken outside the door and he is afraid that it will eat him. ‘My dear fellow,’ says his doctor, ‘you know very well that you are not a grain of seed but a man.’ ‘Of course I know that,’ replies the patient, ‘but does the chicken know it?’
  • Eavan.
    2018-06-27
    Nothing forces anyone to enjoy except the superego. The superego is the imperative of jouissance--Enjoy!
  • Eavan.
    2018-06-23
    If there is a notion of the real, it is extremely complex and, because of this, incomprehensible, it cannot be comprehended in a way that would make an All out of it. 【65】
  • Eavan.
    2018-06-22
    Belonging to a society involves a paradoxical point at which each of us is ordered to embrace freely as the result of our choice what is anyway imposed on us (we all must love our country our parents, our religion). This paradox of willing (choosing freely) what is in any case compulsory, of pretending that there is a free choice although effectively there isnt one, is strictly co-dependent with the notion of an empty symbolic gesture, a gesture- an offer - that is meant to be rejected 【13】
  • Eavan.
    2018-06-22
    it is customary to ask the victim if he agrees with his fate but it is also customary for the victim to say yes.
  • Eavan.
    2018-06-22
    human speech, never merely transmits a message it always also self-reflectively asserts the basic symbolic pact between the communicating subjects. 【12】
  • Lichtung
    2020-01-13
    [M]elancholy (disappointment with all positive empirical objects, none of which can satisfy our desire) is the beginning of philosophy. A person who, all his life, has been used to living in a certain city and is finally compelled to move elsewhere is of course saddened by the prospect of being thrown into a new environment - but what is it that makes him sad? It is not the prospect of leaving the place that was for years his home, but the much more subtle fear of losing his attachment to this place. What makes me sad is my creeping awareness that, sooner or later - sooner than I am ready to admit - I will integrate myself into a new community, forgetting and forgotten by the place that now means so much to me. In short, what makes me sad is the awareness that I will lose my desire for (wh...