科技论文写作与发表教程

• 豆友78586660

  2018-05-16
  it has a dogmatic ring to it because we are not used to seeing authors present their results in the present tense.
• 豆友78586660

  2018-05-16
  It is not a sentence. Thus the order of the words becomes very important.
• 豆友78586660

  2018-05-16
  The fewest possible words that adequately describe the contents of the paper.
• 豆友78586660

  2018-05-16
  Such conferences are normally not designed for the presentation of original data. … are often review papers, presenting reviews of the recent work of particular scientists or recent work in particular laboratories. the vast conference literature that appears in print normally is not primary. If original data are presented in such contributions, the data can and should be published (or republished) in archival (primary) journal. Beause the conference papers are usually reviews of the recent work, if publication in a primary journal follows publication in a conference report, there may be copyright and permission problems.
• 豆友78586660

  2018-05-16
  The preparation of a scientific paper has less to do with literary skill than with organization. A scientific paper is not literature. The preparer of a scientific paper is not an author in the literary sense.
• 豆友78586660

  2018-05-16
  An acceptable primary scientific publication must be the first disclosure containing sufficient information to enable peers: 1. to assess observations 2. to repeat experiments 3. to evaluate intellectual processes moreover, it must be susceptible to sensory perception, essentially permanent, available to the scientific community without restriction, and available for regular screening by one or more of the major recognized secondary services. … Thus, publications such as newsletters, corporate publications, and controlled-circulation journals, many of which are of value for their news or other features, cannot serve as repositories for scientific knowledge.
• 豆友78586660

  2018-05-16
  What question(problem) was studied? The answer is the Introduction. How was the problem studied? The answer is the Methods. What were the findings? The answer is the Results. What do these findings mean? The answer is the Discussion.
• 豆友78586660

  2018-05-16
  A scientific experiment is not complete until the results have been published and understood. Publication is no more than "pressure waves" unless the published paper is understood(声音没有被人听到就相当于没有，而文章没有被别人正确理解就相当于这篇文章没有写). Too many papers fall silently in the woods. A scientist will spend months or years of hard work to secure data, and then unconcernedly let much of their value be lost because of lack of interest in the communication process.
• 豆友78586660

  2018-05-16
  … must provide a written document showing what he or she did, why it was done(reason or significance of the research), how it was done(method), and what was learned from it(results and discussion).
• Ms. X

  2012-03-05
  The logic of IMRAD can be defined in question from: what question was studied? The answer is the Introduction. How was the problem studied? The answer is the Methods. What were the findings? The answer is the Results. What do these findings mean? The answer is the Discussion.