黑格尔的观念论
内容简介：
这是一部重要著作，不仅因为它极大地促进我们对康德和黑格尔的理解，而且也因为它对我们现在作为哲学家和哲学史家的自我形象所提供的洞见。
罗伯特.B.皮平(Robert B.Pippin)，现任芝加哥大学社会思想委员会主任、哲学系教授。
他主编现代欧洲哲学(Modern：European Philosophy)丛书，该丛书收录研究现代欧洲思想的名家名著，由声誉卓著的剑桥大学出版社出版。Idealism as Modernism亦是其中之一。
皮平教授的著作反响强烈，影响重大，他的作品是学术水准的象征。《黑格尔的观念论》一书在当代黑格尔学界产生深远的影响。例如，著名黑格尔学者特瑞·平卡德(Terry Pinkard)在其《黑格尔的现象学》(Hegel’s Phenomenology，New York：Cambridge，1994)一书的答谢辞中明确承认，在所有当代阐释黑格尔的学者中，皮平的著作最深刻的改变了他对黑格尔的观点。此外，德国Campus；出版社编辑、翻译出版他的文集(Die...
下载地址：
标签：
文章链接：https://www.dushupai.com/book-content-22686.html(转载时请注明本文出处及文章链接)
- 上一篇： 专业学位论文开题、写作与答辩
- 下一篇： 郭店竹简与思孟学派
最新评论：
更多
-
智2020-12-31其实翻译的能接受，皮平观点也非常明确，并且相比于pinkard的简单粗暴，皮平还是做了很多精致的处理的，特别是对于精神现象学与康德先验演绎的内在关联，解决了我一些疑惑，至少我以后也不会再用伊波利特或者科耶夫的观点来看待黑格尔所谓的实践哲学。
-
Ludwigsama2020-04-14皮平的主要思路是按照康德的统觉来读黑格尔的概念（实体即主体中的主体就是统觉主体），强调黑格尔的以演证的方式（一个概念只有在概念序列中与其它概念发生关联时才是有效的）避免了康德先验演绎所可能招致的怀疑论威胁。他以这样的解读回答了以下这两个问题：1.概念是如何自规定的 2.概念的自规定为何具有客观性。而概念自规定的过程同时也是自差异的过程，所以1.本质不是外在反思式的“本质”，而是对现象的“副词性”的规定 2.绝对是绝对的差异性，且这种差异性因其独一性而不可通约——故而不存在一种作为方法论的辩证法，在这个基础上，对黑格尔的一种可能的解读策略会是，放弃作为整体主义的“绕圈子”的黑格尔，把黑格尔体系的终点当做是对任何一种试图在思维与存在间建立稳定联系的形而上学的不可能的确认——而这就是齐泽克所做的。
-
阿加莎秋彦2019-08-08Pippin是少数做到了真正所谓“按照辩证法思考黑格尔自身”的人，这点或许更接近一种哲学思考而不仅是研究。两个核心论点，第一个将黑格尔哲学为了达到开放性而自身内含的断裂性和对任何体系、思考的超越性揭示出来（也就是回答了“何谓辩证法？”“为什么要用辩证法思考黑格尔”） 能在出版的中文黑格尔研究里看到这点已经十分珍贵了
最新书摘：
更多
-
浅中2021-03-16Indeed, throughout the Logic, this dependence has been continually apparent. Although Hegel sometimes writes as if dialectical development in the Logic proceeds by showing that "in thinking" one Notion one would really be "thinking its other," we have found that this does not reflect his actual procedure. In trying to understand why the thought of "being as nothing" was a problem, and why Hegel would think that such a problem could be sublated by the thought of becoming, or why the thought of becoming required the determinations of Dasein, we found that we had to refer to what would be an adequate, pure Notional determination of objects. The same was true of such issues as the insufficiency of a qualitatively finite Notion of objects. It is certainly possible, that is, that the world can b...
-
浅中2021-03-16Now, to make final use of the evidence accumulated over the last two chapters, I think that the best way to understand what Hegel is getting at with his "dialectical" Notion of otherness is to see it in the context illuminated by the Kantian framework. That is, to put the point negatively first, if the Logic were to be understood as an extended analysis of the conceptual presuppositions of the Notion of a self-conscious, judging subject, it would be unclear from that "analysis" alone, whether such results had to do with anything other than the Notion of a self-conscious subject. Nothing whatsoever about objects would follow from such analysis. However, Hegel assumes that he has already, prior to the start of the Logic, justified the general claim that no consideration of the determinations...
-
浅中2021-03-16But the method is no less synthetic, since its subject matter, determined immediately as a simple universal, by virtue of the determinateness which it possesses in its very immediacy and universality, exhibits itself as an other [als ein Anderes sich zeigt]. (WL, II, 491; SI, 830; my emphasis)
猜你喜欢：
-
小说文学
-
小说文学
-
小说文学
-
小说文学
-
小说文学豆瓣 7
-
小说文学豆瓣 8
-
小说文学豆瓣 8
-
小说文学
