Business Analysis Valuation: Using Financial Statements (No Cases)

- 书名:Business Analysis Valuation: Using Financial Statements (No Cases)
- 作者: PaulM.Healy KrishnaG.Palepu
- 格式:PDF
- 时间:2024-06-28
- 评分:
- ISBN:9781111972301
Financial statements are the basis for a wide range of business analysis. Managers, securities analysts, bankers, and consultants all use them to make business decisions. There is strong demand among business students for course materials that provide a framework for using financial statement data in a variety of business analysis and valuation contexts. BUSINESS ANALYSIS & VALUATION: USING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, 5E allows you to undertake financial statement analysis using a four-part framework--(1) business strategy analysis for developing an understanding of a firm's competitive strategy; (2) accounting analysis for representing the firm's business economics and strategy in its financial statements, and for developing adjusted accounting measures of performance; (3) financial analysis for ratio analysis and cash flow measures of operating; and (4) prospective analysis. Then, you'll learn how to apply these tools in a variety of decision contexts, including securities analysis, credit analysis, corporate financing policies analysis, mergers and acquisitions analysis, and governance and communication analysis.
Paul M. Healy is James R. Williston Professor of Business Administration, and Unit Head, Accounting and Management, at Harvard Business School, Harvard University. Professor Healy joined Harvard Business School as a Professor of Business Administration in 1997. Professor Healy received his B.C.A. Honors (1st Class) in Accounting and Finance from Victoria University, New Zealand...
- 上一篇: SDL Game Development
- 下一篇: 功能神经影像学
-
小牛2021-07-19一家企业最理想的业务范畴取决于由企业内部完成一系列活动和通过市场机制完成活动的交易成本的对比。
-
小牛2021-07-16战略研究人员传统上认为成本领先战略和差异化战略是互斥的。如果一个公司同时兼具这两种战略而未能从中选择其一,即“被夹在中间”(stuck in the middle)。夹在中间的公司几乎注定是低利润的(中间市场的百货商店竞争者就是“被夹在中间”的典型例子)。这些企业因为成本太高而不能吸引价格敏感的消费者,也不能提供足够的差异化产品或服务以吸引愿意付出高价的消费者。另有研究者试图解释发生在特定竞争者身上的特例,即夹在中间的公司取得了成功。比如,多年来日本汽车制造商成功地证明了低成本和高质量两者可以兼顾,最终战胜了美国和欧洲的竞争者。一般把“夹在中间”竞争成功的公司归因于专注于经营有效性,而非战略有效性,经营有效性使得公司持续推进“生产力前沿”(productivity frontier),因而领先于它们的竞争者。只有当企业通过重大的技术和经营创新、设立巨大的障碍以限制竞争对手效仿时,这种竞争优势才会持久。
-
小牛2021-07-16本章所讨论的行业分析框架,假定行业间有着明确的界限,这也是行业分析的潜在局限性。实际上,划定行业间的界限通常是很困难的。例如,在分析Nordstrom公司所在的行业时,难道应该仅仅局限于分析那些大型百货公司,或者把那些同Nordstrom公司争夺市场份额的小型专业零售商也包括在内?随着折扣零售商和低价零售商的出现,难道应该把Wal-Mart公司和TJX公司也包括在内吗?那么像Amazon.com这样的互联网零售商呢?不合适的行业界定将导致不完备的分析和不准确的预测,因此准确划定行业是很重要的。
-
英文原版
-
英文原版
-
英文原版
-
英文原版
-
英文原版
-
英文原版
-
英文原版
-
英文原版