巴别塔之后

• 发表：2024-06-28
• 分类：小说文学
• 围观：46

• momo

  2022-09-17
  果然是名副其实的“面面观”，宏大全面又缜密细致，透过译文也能感受到作者利落又漂亮的文风。这种书真的是，随便从里面抓出一句都可以往下追索出无尽的知识，可恨自己语言、文学、文化的知识均十分浅薄，读此书实在是力不从心，只能不停感慨：他好厉害啊！译者也好厉害啊！这才是学者！作为一个语言学废物，看一般的语言学著作时，我只觉得寡味，但看这本书时，我只痛恨自己怎么就这么废呢，不然可以窥得多么远奥丰富的一个世界。
• 昭质

  2022-05-11
  斯坦纳聊自然科学真是让人精神抖擞！“时间的流动是有向的。宇宙的真实状况是趋于平衡（即热寂）的热力学过程……当熵达到最大值时未来也就结束了。” 即便某些部分的熵在减少，整体还是会停止
• 冲鸭

  2021-11-07
  我只能说，大牛就敢这么写，80%在自我噫语。而80%的读者自我感觉看懂了。他告诉我们最伟大的作家和评论家，都是靠一种感觉，正如同你说莎士比亚是垃圾，无法反驳一样。伟大的作家能创造出语言的时间深邃感，它的难度也都来自于指涉性的文献支持。最后解释一下，打4颗星，我完全没有资格来评价这本书，这只是代表了我的阅读体验。

• Ja

  2023-02-15
  Our languages simultaneously structure and are structured by time, by the syntax of past, present, and future. In Hell, that is to say in a grammar without futures, ‘we literally hear how the verbs kill time’ (Mandelstam’s penetrating comment on Dante and on linguistic form echoes his own asphyxia under political terror, in the absence of tomorrow). But ‘at other times,’ itself an extraordinary locution, it is only through language and, perhaps through music, that man can make free of time, that he can overcome momentarily the presence and presentness of his own punctual death.
• Ja

  2023-02-15
  There could be no personal, no social history as we know them, without the ever-renewed springs of life in future-tense propositions. These constitute what Ibsen called ‘the Life-lie,’ the complex dynamism of projection, of will, of consoling illusion, on which our psychic and, conceivably, our biological perpetuation hinge. There can be spasms of despair in the individual and in the community, solicitations of ‘neverness’ and of that last great repose which haunted Freud in Beyond the Pleasure Principle. Suicide is a recurrent option, as are resolutions of communal extinction, by sacrificial violence or a refusal to bear children. But these nihilistic temptations remain fitful and, statistically considered, rare. The language fabric we inhabit, the conventions of forwardness so deeply ent...
• Ja

  2023-02-15
  Whatever may be the proto-linguistic or meta-linguistic codes of other species, I would want to argue strongly that man alone has developed a grammar of futurity. Primates use rudimentary tools but, so far as has been observed, they do not store tools for future usage. There is a vital sense in which that grammar has ‘developed man,’ in which we can be defined as a mammal that uses the future of the verb ‘to be.’ Only he, as writes Paul Celan in Atemwende, can cast nets ‘in rivers north of the future.’ The syntactic development is inextricably inwoven with historical self-awareness. The ‘axiomatic fictions’ of forward inference and anticipation are far more than a specialized gain of human consciousness. They are, I believe, a survival factor of the utmost importance. The provision of conc...

• 小说文学
  
  新共生思想
• 小说文学
  
  实验语音学概要
• 小说文学
  
  春润集
• 小说文学
  
  世界历史与救赎历史
• 小说文学
  
  电影要从非电影处来
• 小说文学
  
  植物发育生物学
• 小说文学
  
  笛卡尔语言学
• 小说文学
  
  2022年全国硕士研究生招生考试思想政治理论考试大纲