奠基者：独立战争那一代

• 发表：2024-06-06
• 分类：历史传记
• 围观：50

• 黑猫君

  2016-08-27
  以华盛顿，汉密尔顿，麦迪逊，亚当斯和杰斐逊等人为主体，探讨了美国建国时期的制度变革以及诸多重大决策的实行背景。建都。废奴，退位，等等。可惜作者的主观臆测太多。
• 猪头妖怪

  2017-12-26
  那一代奠基者们的合作、争斗和妥协，塑造了伟大的历史，为整个人类留下了一笔巨大的财富，但同时又给后世投下了一道长长的阴影。他们无法解决的问题，最终被交给了时间。正如杰斐逊给亚当斯的信中所言：“解决（奴隶制）这个问题尚需时日：然而我不希望你或我能看到答案。毫无疑问，他们会相互争夺好一会儿，从而给了我们离开人世的足够时间。”
• 蓝道_RANDALL

  2018-05-04
  美国众神及一系列美国诞生里就存在的问题，中学生可以读读

• 照叶

  2020-08-06
  ...Support for American independence, for example, was always fragile and shifted with each victory or defeat in the field, which was often a matter of pure luck. Or the decision to locate the national capital on the Potomac was a back-room deal involving so many secret bargains and bribes that no one would ever unravel the full story.In the same vein, all the heroic portraits of the great men were romanticized distortions. Franklin, for example, was a superb scientist and masterful prose stylist, to be sure, but also a vacuous political thinker and diplomatic fraud, who spent the bulk of his time in Paris flirting with younger women of the salon set. Washington was an indisputable American patriarch, but more an actor than a leader, brilliant at striking poses “in a strain of Shakespeare...
• 照叶

  2020-08-06
  The insight was precocious, anticipating as it did the distinction between history as experienced and history as remembered, most famously depicted in Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace. (The core insight—that all seamless historical narratives are latter-day constructions—lies at the center of all postmodern critiques of traditional historical explanations.) Under Rush’s prodding influence and in response to his dreamy inspirations, Adams realized that the act of transforming the American Revolution into history placed a premium on selecting events and heroes that fit neatly into a dramatic formula, thereby distorting the more tangled and incoherent experience that participants actually making the history felt at the time. Jefferson’s drafting of the Declaration of Independence was a perfect exa...
• 照叶

  2020-08-06
  After 1800, what Adams had called “the monarchical principle” was dead in American political culture, along with the kind of towering defiance that both Washington and Adams had harbored toward what might be called the “morality of partisanship.” That defiance had always depended upon revolutionary credentials—those present at the creation of the republic could be trusted to act responsibly—and as the memory of the Revolution faded, so did the trust it conferred. Of course Jefferson could, and decidedly did, claim membership in “the band of brothers,” but his election marked the end of an era. The “people” had replaced the “public” as the sovereign source of political wisdom. No leader could credibly claim to be above the fray. As Jefferson had understood from the moment Washington stepped...

• 《奠基者：独立战争那一代》适合哪些读者阅读？

  《奠基者：独立战争那一代》适合对历史、政治及人物传记感兴趣的读者。无论是专业研究者还是普通历史爱好者，都能从中获得启发。作者约瑟夫·J·埃利斯以生动的笔触，将复杂的政治事件与人物心理结合，使《奠基者》既具学术深度又富可读性。书中对汉密尔顿、杰斐逊等“奠基者”的立体刻画，尤其适合希望深入了解美国建国历程及人性复杂性的读者。

• 《奠基者：独立战争那一代》对建国初期政治生态的揭示有何意义？

  《奠基者：独立战争那一代》通过七位元勋的互动，深刻揭示了建国初期复杂多变的政治生态。作者约瑟夫·J·埃利斯在书中展示了不同政治理念间的激烈碰撞，以及个人性格如何影响国家走向。这种描写不仅还原了历史真相，更让读者理解美国民主制度的形成并非一蹴而就，而是各方妥协与博弈的结果。《奠基者》因此成为解读美国政治文化起源的重要文本。

• 《奠基者：独立战争那一代》如何理解伯尔的角色？

  《奠基者：独立战争那一代》将伯尔描绘为一位才华横溢但充满争议的人物，他的命运常与汉密尔顿的悲剧交织。作者约瑟夫·J·埃利斯在书中指出，伯尔虽未像其他元勋那样获得崇高历史地位，但其政治手腕和野心反映了建国初期权力斗争的残酷。书中通过伯尔的故事，揭示了《奠基者》群体中那些被边缘化或走向反面的人物，展现了历史的多面性。

• 历史传记
  
  殖产兴业
• 历史传记
  
  格格不入
• 历史传记
  
  秦始皇帝陵园考古报告
• 历史传记
  
  德国史稿：1555—1618
• 历史传记
  
  云南省抗日战争时期人口伤亡和财产损失
• 历史传记
  
  楚地出土战国简册合集（一）
• 历史传记
  
  古罗马币
• 历史传记
  
  宣和博古图