斐德若篇
- 书名：斐德若篇
- 作者： 柏拉图
- 格式：AZW3,MOBI,EPUB
- 时间：2024-06-14
- 评分：9.4
- ISBN：9787100164016
内容简介：
柏拉图（约前427—前347），古希腊哲学家，也是西方最伟大的哲学家和思想家之一。在这篇对话中，对修辞术狂热的美少年斐德若与苏格拉底相遇，并与苏格拉底分享一篇新得的文章，文章作者修辞学家莱什阿斯主张，没有爱情的人比有爱情的人更值得被爱。苏格拉底在神的激励下，另作了二篇关于爱情这一主题的文章，一篇与莱什阿斯的观点类似，一篇则与之完全相反。之后，他们就这三篇文章，讨论了修辞术的正确使用、书写文字与口头语言的关系等问题。苏格拉底认为，文章应当阐明真理，最好言辞既不是公开发表的文章，也不是私底下的对话，而是写在受教者灵魂中活生生的言辞，这样的言辞不仅可以滋养灵魂，而且会使拥有这类言辞的人选择他的谈话对象，选择恰当的时机，以恰当的方式将灵魂中的真理诉诸口头表达或者书面写作。
下载地址：
标签：
文章链接：https://www.dushupai.com/book-content-13747.html(转载时请注明本文出处及文章链接)
最新评论：
更多
-
Pilot K.2022-04-03为两位老师牺牲午睡时间奉献胡说八道的精神打五星。
-
J2021-07-21发现对话体不太好“划重点”，觉得说了很重要的话但回头发现一笔没画，也终于体会到了苏格拉底的伟大之处，如果现在的学术工作不再是一个人的埋头苦干，能多些这种面对面的机会（像对空言说里提到的，必须脸对脸的交流），我想学术工作也不再会那么枯燥乏味，不再那么孤独寂寞，不再那么多白费力气，也不再那么那样煎熬苦难，我想当代的学者缺少的就是这样辩论交流的机会，这样大家才能一点点的摸索出真理，这样的学术生活也会更加美好，前半段还是在讲会饮篇中的遗留问题，爱是理性与肉欲的结合，后半段是很棒的写作方法的讨论，特别是对于学术写作，什么是好的论证，如何写一篇好的论文，特别有指导性
-
Erio2020-09-11朱光潜文采不错，可惜皮被老鼠胶撕掉了
最新书摘：
更多
-
Silenus2024-01-04And further, if you were to select the best from among your lovers, your choice would be made from a small number; but if from the rest of the world, you were to select the man who is most suitable to yourself, it would be made from a large number; so that there is far more reason to expect that in the larger number exists the one who is deserving of your attachment.If, moreover, you stand in awe of public opinion, and dread its reproaches on the affair being discovered, it is but natural to suppose that lovers, from an idea that others will deem them as happy as they esteem themselves, will be so elated as to talk of their intimacy, and with ostentatious vanity give all men to know that their labour has not been spent in vain; but that we on the other hand, who by never loving never lose...
-
ROOT18862023-12-02like so many others of Plato’s works, it leaves its own questions unanswered. To question the Phaedrus, therefore, is to continue asking its questions. Asking its questions, questioning the answers we give them, and even disputing the interpretation of Socrates’ Great Speech given here, are, of course, doing philosophy.
-
ROOT18862023-12-02The Phaedrus is not simply discarding a rusted tool that has outlived its usefulness. It is leaving behind a set of views that had led to the most valuable form human life can take; without such views such a life could not have been articulated in the first place. Socrates’ Great Speech exudes gratitude for what first made that life possible. It is a farewell to a dying friend; but its beauty has secured that friend an undying afterlife...since Plato first introduced the Forms, in the Symposium, through a speech on erōs (210e–212b), nothing would have been more appropriate than to have taken leave of them through a speech on the same topic.42 Erōs is literally the beginning and the end of the theory of Forms of Plato’s middle dialogues, and the Phaedrus is Plato’s valedictory address to ...
猜你喜欢：
-
小说文学豆瓣 8
-
小说文学豆瓣 7
-
小说文学豆瓣 8
-
小说文学豆瓣 7
-
小说文学豆瓣 8
-
小说文学豆瓣 7
-
小说文学豆瓣 8
-
小说文学豆瓣 9
